Home

The · Bureau · of · Iskandran · Prediction · and · Diversion


Wisdom: the one thing standing between us and disaster

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · User Info

* * *
In a locked post, I just had pointed out to me an opinion piece by William Saletan that reads like hardcore Religious Right. (Since I'm not familiar with his writings, I won't say "unexpectedly"...but that is not his politics.)

The problems I have with the U.K. Human Fertilization and Embrology Authority's revised guidelines are on different grounds, but ultimately reach a similar conclusion.

You can't have it all (biases for intelligence and physical health don't mix; neither do biases for intelligence and mentally stable) — and you can't predict what "minor" "defects" provide useful immunities. The latter was known in the 1970's; the former is unequivocal now that we have reasonable human genome databases.

So you don't need a slippery-slope argument here.

* * *
I'm recording this for later analysis. [Ultimately, I want a functional population dynamics model. Multiple aspects of the science fantasy depend on it.]

Mirror sources: PeakOilNews/Alternet.

Turn off the gas, and a lot of American families would have a hard time cooking dinner -- but a lot of families in places like Nepal and Guatemala would have nothing to cook.

.....

A world of 6.4 billion people, on the way to 9 billion or more, needs more protein than the planet's croplands can generate from biologically provided nitrogen. Our species has become as physically dependent on industrially produced nitrogen fertilizer as it is on soil, sunshine and water. And that means we're hooked on natural gas.

Or other cheap energy/base stocks for nitrogen fixation, etc. Technically, natural gas (methane) is a renewable resource — not only can it be harvested from the sewer system, agriculture has elevated its atmospheric level above geological normal for the past five thousand years or so. This shows not only directly (ice cores), but in a greenhouse effect that is indirectly observable by comparing estimated temperatures with one ice age cycle back.
Vaclav Smil, distinguished professor at the University of Manitoba and author of the 2004 book Enriching the Earth: Fritz Haber, Carl Bosch and the Transformation of World Food Production, has demonstrated the global food system's startling degree of dependence on nitrogen fertilization. Using simple math -- the kind you can do in your head if there's no calculator handy -- Smil showed that 40 percent of the protein in human bodies, planet-wide, would not exist without the application of synthetic nitrogen to crops during most of the 20th century.

That means that without the use of industrially produced nitrogen fertilizer, about 2.5 billion people out of today's world population of 6.2 billion simply could never have existed.

While these numbers need fact-checking, I'm willing to bet they're a gross overestimate; the actual population limit should be much closer to pre-industrialization normal (~1.25 billion?).

* * *
If you want in (or out), let me know here. [All comments screened.]
* * *

Advertisement